Capital Regional District Water Supply is screened as a public-body recipient, not a commercial supplier

A candidate intergovernmental screen. It is left out of “top supplier” lists and the commercial concentration measure.

A large disclosed recipient is a candidate public body / remitter / utility, so a naive 'top supplier' ranking is misleading.

Open each schedule at the cited page and find the row. Amounts are stored as exact cents from the printed page.

Is this large recipient a public body / remitter / utility / P3 entity / intergovernmental flow rather than a commercial supplier?

A public-body / remitter / utility classification is a candidate screen, not a legal finding about a supplier or a competition outcome. It does not mean the flow was non-commercial or exempt from procurement rules.