Screened as a public body · 7 yearly totals · 2023–2025

Capital Regional District

Printed asCapital Regional DistrictCAPITAL REGIONAL DISTRICT

Three public bodies disclosed paying this name a combined $12,270,987.43 over three fiscal years.

$12.3M

from 3 public bodies over 3 fiscal years · #32 of 2,251 names by total disclosed

Who paid, and when

Each cell is one body’s yearly total for this name. Darker means more.

’232023’242024’252025

Victoria$791Kdisclosed$1.13Mdisclosed$894Kdisclosed

Oak Bay$2.79Mlarge shareNo schedulenot held here$3.14Mlarge share

Saanich$1.68Mlarge share$1.84Mlarge share—not in schedule

Schedule held, name not in itNo schedule held — a coverage gap, not zero

Disclosed to this name, by public body and fiscal year
Public body	2023	2024	2025
City of Victoria	$790,692.26	$1,131,513	$893,757.17
District of Oak Bay	$2,785,479	No schedule held	$3,143,230
District of Saanich	$1,683,372	$1,842,944	Not in the schedule

By year, all bodies

Stacked by payer.

2023$5,259,543.26

2024$2,974,457

2025$4,036,987.17

VictoriaOak BaySaanich

Every disclosed amount

One line per body and year, exactly as published. Each source link opens the official document at the page.

Download these 7 rows (CSV)

City of Victoria · 20252025$893,757.17Capital Regional District2025 schedule, row 75

City of Victoria · 20242024$1,131,513Capital Regional District2024 schedule, row 73

City of Victoria · 20232023$790,692.26Capital Regional District2023 schedule, row 64

District of Oak Bay · 20252025$3,143,230Capital Regional District2025 schedule, p. 106 · line 23

District of Oak Bay · 20232023$2,785,479Capital Regional District2023 schedule, p. 40 · line 18

District of Saanich · 20242024$1,842,944CAPITAL REGIONAL DISTRICT2024 schedule, p. 57 · line 52

District of Saanich · 20232023$1,683,372CAPITAL REGIONAL DISTRICT2023 schedule, p. 56 · line 51

All amounts in Canadian dollars. A year with no line means the name wasn’t in that schedule, or the schedule isn’t held here — not that the body paid nothing.

A line here doesn’t match its source? Report a correction →

Notices for this name

Automated screens. Each is a question to investigate, not a finding.

Paid by several bodiesNot reviewed

$12,270,987.43 across the schedules that print this exact name

Question to ask: Do more than one public body disclose this same exact-name label, and is it one legal entity or two? (An exact-name overlap is not an entity resolution.)
What it does not prove: It does not establish that the label is one legal entity. This is an exact-name overlap only; entity resolution, ownership, competition, or legal conclusions require separate source-backed evidence.

Public-body recipientNot reviewed

A candidate intergovernmental screen. It is left out of “top supplier” lists and the commercial concentration measure.

Question to ask: Is this large recipient a public body / remitter / utility / P3 entity / intergovernmental flow rather than a commercial supplier?
What it does not prove: A public-body / remitter / utility classification is a candidate screen, not a legal finding about a supplier or a competition outcome. It does not mean the flow was non-commercial or exempt from procurement rules.

Year-over-year jumpNot reviewed

Saanich: $1.84M → $0 (2024→25)

Question to ask: Does the year-over-year change reflect a new or terminating relationship, or a re-classification or one-off, and what (if any) project or contract evidence explains it?
What it does not prove: A year-over-year change in a disclosed aggregate amount is not evidence of a new contract, a non-competitive award, or wrongdoing. Timing and context require project, contract, or council-record evidence.