Supplier name · 6 yearly totals · 2023–2025

Coast Utility Contracting Ltd

Printed asCoast Utility Contracting LtdCoast Utility Contracting Ltd.

Two public bodies disclosed paying this name a combined $18,119,963.45 over three fiscal years.

$18.1M

from 2 public bodies over 3 fiscal years · #19 of 2,251 names by total disclosed

Who paid, and when

Each cell is one body’s yearly total for this name. Darker means more.

’232023’242024’252025

CRD$6.25Mlarge share$5.26Mlarge share$3.91Mlarge share

Victoria$672Kdisclosed$619Kdisclosed$1.41Mdisclosed

Schedule held, name not in itNo schedule held — a coverage gap, not zero

Disclosed to this name, by public body and fiscal year
Public body	2023	2024	2025
Capital Regional District	$6,250,764	$5,261,149	$3,907,761
City of Victoria	$671,913.32	$618,772	$1,409,604.13

By year, all bodies

Stacked by payer.

2023$6,922,677.32

2024$5,879,921

2025$5,317,365.13

CRDVictoria

Every disclosed amount

One line per body and year, exactly as published. Each source link opens the official document at the page.

Download these 6 rows (CSV)

Capital Regional District · 20252025$3,907,761Coast Utility Contracting Ltd.2025 schedule, p. 65 · line 141

Capital Regional District · 20242024$5,261,149Coast Utility Contracting Ltd2024 schedule, p. 65 · line 126

Capital Regional District · 20232023$6,250,764Coast Utility Contracting Ltd2023 schedule, p. 67 · line 108

City of Victoria · 20252025$1,409,604.13Coast Utility Contracting Ltd2025 schedule, row 90

City of Victoria · 20242024$618,772Coast Utility Contracting Ltd2024 schedule, row 91

City of Victoria · 20232023$671,913.32Coast Utility Contracting Ltd2023 schedule, row 85

All amounts in Canadian dollars. A year with no line means the name wasn’t in that schedule, or the schedule isn’t held here — not that the body paid nothing.

A line here doesn’t match its source? Report a correction →

Notices for this name

Automated screens. Each is a question to investigate, not a finding.

Paid by several bodiesNot reviewed

$14,212,202.45 across the schedules that print this exact name

Question to ask: Do more than one public body disclose this same exact-name label, and is it one legal entity or two? (An exact-name overlap is not an entity resolution.)
What it does not prove: It does not establish that the label is one legal entity. This is an exact-name overlap only; entity resolution, ownership, competition, or legal conclusions require separate source-backed evidence.

New nameNot reviewed

CRD: $3,907,761 in 2025, first year printed

Question to ask: Does the year-over-year change reflect a new or terminating relationship, or a re-classification or one-off, and what (if any) project or contract evidence explains it?
What it does not prove: A year-over-year change in a disclosed aggregate amount is not evidence of a new contract, a non-competitive award, or wrongdoing. Timing and context require project, contract, or council-record evidence.

Year-over-year jumpNot reviewed

CRD: $5.26M → $0 (2024→25)

Question to ask: Does the year-over-year change reflect a new or terminating relationship, or a re-classification or one-off, and what (if any) project or contract evidence explains it?
What it does not prove: A year-over-year change in a disclosed aggregate amount is not evidence of a new contract, a non-competitive award, or wrongdoing. Timing and context require project, contract, or council-record evidence.