Skip to content
Public SpendPublic SpendCapital Region

Supplier name · 3 yearly totals · Saanich only

DESJARDINS FINANCIAL SECURITY (Employer & Employee contributions)

Printed asDESJARDINS FINANCIAL SECURITY (Employer & Employee contributions)DESJARDINS FINANCIAL SECURITY(Employer & Employee contributions)

The District of Saanich disclosed paying this name $22,133,162 over three fiscal years.

$22.1M

from 1 public body over 3 fiscal years · #15 of 2,251 names by total disclosed

Who paid, and when

Each cell is one body’s yearly total for this name. Darker means more.

232023242024252025
Saanich$6.25Mlarge share$7.58Mlarge share$8.30Mlarge share
Schedule held, name not in itNo schedule held — a coverage gap, not zero
Disclosed to this name, by public body and fiscal year
Public body202320242025
District of Saanich$6,247,351$7,583,491$8,302,320

By year, all bodies

Stacked by payer.

2023$6,247,351
2024$7,583,491
2025$8,302,320
Saanich

Every disclosed amount

One line per body and year, exactly as published. Each source link opens the official document at the page.

Download these 3 rows (CSV)
District of Saanich · 20252025$8,302,320DESJARDINS FINANCIAL SECURITY(Employer & Employee contributions)2025 schedule, p. 58 · line 109
District of Saanich · 20242024$7,583,491DESJARDINS FINANCIAL SECURITY(Employer & Employee contributions)2024 schedule, p. 58 · line 95
District of Saanich · 20232023$6,247,351DESJARDINS FINANCIAL SECURITY (Employer & Employee contributions)2023 schedule, p. 57 · line 91

All amounts in Canadian dollars. A year with no line means the name wasn’t in that schedule, or the schedule isn’t held here — not that the body paid nothing.

A line here doesn’t match its source? Report a correction →

Notices for this name

Automated screens. Each is a question to investigate, not a finding.

New nameNot reviewed
New nameNot reviewed
Question to ask
Does the year-over-year change reflect a new or terminating relationship, or a re-classification or one-off, and what (if any) project or contract evidence explains it?
What it does not prove
A year-over-year change in a disclosed aggregate amount is not evidence of a new contract, a non-competitive award, or wrongdoing. Timing and context require project, contract, or council-record evidence.
Year-over-year jumpNot reviewed
Year-over-year jumpNot reviewed
Question to ask
Does the year-over-year change reflect a new or terminating relationship, or a re-classification or one-off, and what (if any) project or contract evidence explains it?
What it does not prove
A year-over-year change in a disclosed aggregate amount is not evidence of a new contract, a non-competitive award, or wrongdoing. Timing and context require project, contract, or council-record evidence.