Skip to content
Public SpendPublic SpendCapital Region

Supplier name · 4 yearly totals · 2023–2025

DL's Bins Ltd

Printed asDL's Bins LtdDL's Bins Ltd.

Two public bodies disclosed paying this name a combined $21,431,760 over three fiscal years.

$21.4M

from 2 public bodies over 3 fiscal years · #16 of 2,251 names by total disclosed

Who paid, and when

Each cell is one body’s yearly total for this name. Darker means more.

232023242024252025
CRD$3.62Mdisclosed$8.14Mlarge share$9.61Mlarge share
Oak Baynot in scheduleNo schedulenot held here$56Kdisclosed
Schedule held, name not in itNo schedule held — a coverage gap, not zero
Disclosed to this name, by public body and fiscal year
Public body202320242025
Capital Regional District$3,617,792$8,144,212$9,613,338
District of Oak BayNot in the scheduleNo schedule held$56,418

By year, all bodies

Stacked by payer.

2023$3,617,792
2024$8,144,212
2025$9,669,756
CRDOak Bay

Every disclosed amount

One line per body and year, exactly as published. Each source link opens the official document at the page.

Download these 4 rows (CSV)
Capital Regional District · 20252025$9,613,338DL's Bins Ltd.2025 schedule, p. 66 · line 188
Capital Regional District · 20242024$8,144,212DL's Bins Ltd2024 schedule, p. 66 · line 168
Capital Regional District · 20232023$3,617,792DL's Bins Ltd2023 schedule, p. 68 · line 149
District of Oak Bay · 20252025$56,418DL's Bins Ltd2025 schedule, p. 106 · line 36

All amounts in Canadian dollars. A year with no line means the name wasn’t in that schedule, or the schedule isn’t held here — not that the body paid nothing.

A line here doesn’t match its source? Report a correction →

Notices for this name

Automated screens. Each is a question to investigate, not a finding.

Paid by several bodiesNot reviewed
Paid by several bodiesNot reviewed
Question to ask
Do more than one public body disclose this same exact-name label, and is it one legal entity or two? (An exact-name overlap is not an entity resolution.)
What it does not prove
It does not establish that the label is one legal entity. This is an exact-name overlap only; entity resolution, ownership, competition, or legal conclusions require separate source-backed evidence.
New nameNot reviewed
New nameNot reviewed
Question to ask
Does the year-over-year change reflect a new or terminating relationship, or a re-classification or one-off, and what (if any) project or contract evidence explains it?
What it does not prove
A year-over-year change in a disclosed aggregate amount is not evidence of a new contract, a non-competitive award, or wrongdoing. Timing and context require project, contract, or council-record evidence.
Year-over-year jumpNot reviewed
Year-over-year jumpNot reviewed
Question to ask
Does the year-over-year change reflect a new or terminating relationship, or a re-classification or one-off, and what (if any) project or contract evidence explains it?
What it does not prove
A year-over-year change in a disclosed aggregate amount is not evidence of a new contract, a non-competitive award, or wrongdoing. Timing and context require project, contract, or council-record evidence.