Supplier name · 3 yearly totals · 2025

G&E Contracting LP

Printed asG & E CONTRACTING LPG&E Contracting LPG&E Contracting Lp

Three public bodies disclosed paying this name a combined $5,081,499 over fiscal 2025.

$5.1M

from 3 public bodies over 1 fiscal year · #71 of 2,251 names by total disclosed

Who paid, and when

Each cell is one body’s yearly total for this name. Darker means more.

’232023’242024’252025

CRD—not in schedule—not in schedule$811Kdisclosed

Oak Bay—not in scheduleNo schedulenot held here$2.84Mlarge share

Saanich—not in schedule—not in schedule$1.43Mlarge share

Schedule held, name not in itNo schedule held — a coverage gap, not zero

Disclosed to this name, by public body and fiscal year
Public body	2023	2024	2025
Capital Regional District	Not in the schedule	Not in the schedule	$811,186
District of Oak Bay	Not in the schedule	No schedule held	$2,844,390
District of Saanich	Not in the schedule	Not in the schedule	$1,425,923

By year, all bodies

Stacked by payer.

2023—

2024—

2025$5,081,499

CRDOak BaySaanich

Every disclosed amount

One line per body and year, exactly as published. Each source link opens the official document at the page.

Download these 3 rows (CSV)

Capital Regional District · 20252025$811,186G&E Contracting LP2025 schedule, p. 68 · line 242

District of Oak Bay · 20252025$2,844,390G&E Contracting Lp2025 schedule, p. 106 · line 51

District of Saanich · 20252025$1,425,923G & E CONTRACTING LP2025 schedule, p. 59 · line 149

All amounts in Canadian dollars. A year with no line means the name wasn’t in that schedule, or the schedule isn’t held here — not that the body paid nothing.

A line here doesn’t match its source? Report a correction →

Notices for this name

Automated screens. Each is a question to investigate, not a finding.

Paid by several bodiesNot reviewed

$3,655,576 across the schedules that print this exact name

Question to ask: Do more than one public body disclose this same exact-name label, and is it one legal entity or two? (An exact-name overlap is not an entity resolution.)
What it does not prove: It does not establish that the label is one legal entity. This is an exact-name overlap only; entity resolution, ownership, competition, or legal conclusions require separate source-backed evidence.

New nameNot reviewed

Saanich: $1,425,923 in 2025, first year printed

Question to ask: Does the year-over-year change reflect a new or terminating relationship, or a re-classification or one-off, and what (if any) project or contract evidence explains it?
What it does not prove: A year-over-year change in a disclosed aggregate amount is not evidence of a new contract, a non-competitive award, or wrongdoing. Timing and context require project, contract, or council-record evidence.