Supplier name · 8 yearly totals · 2023–2025

GFL Environmental Inc

Printed asGFL Environmental IncGFL ENVIRONMENTAL INCGFL Environmental Inc.

Three public bodies disclosed paying this name a combined $24,856,918 over three fiscal years.

$24.9M

from 3 public bodies over 3 fiscal years · #13 of 2,251 names by total disclosed

Who paid, and when

Each cell is one body’s yearly total for this name. Darker means more.

’232023’242024’252025

CRD$1.64Mdisclosed$10.32Mlarge share$11.63Mlarge share

Victoria$131Kas “…Environmental” ↗—not in schedule—not in schedule

Oak Bay$487KdisclosedNo schedulenot held here$651Kdisclosed

Saanich$27Kdisclosed$53Kdisclosed$48Kdisclosed

Schedule held, name not in itNo schedule held — a coverage gap, not zeroSimilar name, printed differently — not added in

Disclosed to this name, by public body and fiscal year
Public body	2023	2024	2025
Capital Regional District	$1,643,250	$10,319,591	$11,627,949
City of Victoria	Printed differently as GFL Environmental, not added in	Not in the schedule	Not in the schedule
District of Oak Bay	$486,503	No schedule held	$651,364
District of Saanich	$27,047	$52,950	$48,264

By year, all bodies

Stacked by payer.

2023$2,156,800

2024$10,372,541

2025$12,327,577

CRDOak BaySaanich

Every disclosed amount

One line per body and year, exactly as published. Each source link opens the official document at the page.

Download these 8 rows (CSV)

Capital Regional District · 20252025$11,627,949GFL Environmental Inc.2025 schedule, p. 68 · line 252

Capital Regional District · 20242024$10,319,591GFL Environmental Inc2024 schedule, p. 69 · line 239

Capital Regional District · 20232023$1,643,250GFL Environmental Inc2023 schedule, p. 70 · line 206

District of Oak Bay · 20252025$651,364GFL Environmental Inc2025 schedule, p. 106 · line 54

District of Oak Bay · 20232023$486,503GFL Environmental Inc2023 schedule, p. 40 · line 45

District of Saanich · 20252025$48,264GFL ENVIRONMENTAL INC2025 schedule, p. 59 · line 155

District of Saanich · 20242024$52,950GFL ENVIRONMENTAL INC2024 schedule, p. 59 · line 135

District of Saanich · 20232023$27,047GFL ENVIRONMENTAL INC2023 schedule, p. 57 · line 130

All amounts in Canadian dollars. A year with no line means the name wasn’t in that schedule, or the schedule isn’t held here — not that the body paid nothing.

A line here doesn’t match its source? Report a correction →

Notices for this name

Automated screens. Each is a question to investigate, not a finding.

Paid by several bodiesNot reviewed

$13,228,969 across the schedules that print this exact name

Question to ask: Do more than one public body disclose this same exact-name label, and is it one legal entity or two? (An exact-name overlap is not an entity resolution.)
What it does not prove: It does not establish that the label is one legal entity. This is an exact-name overlap only; entity resolution, ownership, competition, or legal conclusions require separate source-backed evidence.

New nameNot reviewed

CRD: $11,627,949 in 2025, first year printed

Question to ask: Does the year-over-year change reflect a new or terminating relationship, or a re-classification or one-off, and what (if any) project or contract evidence explains it?
What it does not prove: A year-over-year change in a disclosed aggregate amount is not evidence of a new contract, a non-competitive award, or wrongdoing. Timing and context require project, contract, or council-record evidence.

Large yearly totalNot reviewed

CRD 2025: $11,627,949 CRD 2024: $10,319,591

Question to ask: For a large disclosed aggregate, is the label one supplier or several, and for an 'In Trust' payee who is the actual client or beneficial recipient?
What it does not prove: This is an annual aggregate disclosed amount, not an invoice, contract, transaction count, beneficial-owner attribution, or procurement finding. For an 'In Trust' / intermediary payee it does not show the client or beneficial recipient.

Year-over-year jumpNot reviewed

CRD: $1.64M → $10.32M (2023→24)CRD: $10.32M → $0 (2024→25)

Question to ask: Does the year-over-year change reflect a new or terminating relationship, or a re-classification or one-off, and what (if any) project or contract evidence explains it?
What it does not prove: A year-over-year change in a disclosed aggregate amount is not evidence of a new contract, a non-competitive award, or wrongdoing. Timing and context require project, contract, or council-record evidence.