Screened as a public body · 8 yearly totals · 2023–2025

Greater Victoria Public Library

Printed asGreater Victoria Public LibraryGREATER VICTORIA PUBLIC LIBRARY

Three public bodies disclosed paying this name a combined $40,495,332 over three fiscal years.

$40.5M

from 3 public bodies over 3 fiscal years · #5 of 2,251 names by total disclosed

Who paid, and when

Each cell is one body’s yearly total for this name. Darker means more.

’232023’242024’252025

Victoria$5.47Mlarge share$5.23Mlarge share$6.56Mlarge share

Oak Bay$1.24MdisclosedNo schedulenot held here$1.42Mdisclosed

Saanich$6.37Mlarge share$6.73Mlarge share$7.47Mlarge share

Schedule held, name not in itNo schedule held — a coverage gap, not zero

Disclosed to this name, by public body and fiscal year
Public body	2023	2024	2025
City of Victoria	$5,472,096	$5,230,897	$6,560,188
District of Oak Bay	$1,235,493	No schedule held	$1,418,701
District of Saanich	$6,372,200	$6,731,938	$7,473,819

By year, all bodies

Stacked by payer.

2023$13,079,789

2024$11,962,835

2025$15,452,708

VictoriaOak BaySaanich

Every disclosed amount

One line per body and year, exactly as published. Each source link opens the official document at the page.

Download these 8 rows (CSV)

City of Victoria · 20252025$6,560,188Greater Victoria Public Library2025 schedule, row 177

City of Victoria · 20242024$5,230,897Greater Victoria Public Library2024 schedule, row 179

City of Victoria · 20232023$5,472,096Greater Victoria Public Library2023 schedule, row 170

District of Oak Bay · 20252025$1,418,701Greater Victoria Public Library2025 schedule, p. 106 · line 59

District of Oak Bay · 20232023$1,235,493Greater Victoria Public Library2023 schedule, p. 40 · line 49

District of Saanich · 20252025$7,473,819GREATER VICTORIA PUBLIC LIBRARY2025 schedule, p. 59 · line 161

District of Saanich · 20242024$6,731,938GREATER VICTORIA PUBLIC LIBRARY2024 schedule, p. 59 · line 140

District of Saanich · 20232023$6,372,200GREATER VICTORIA PUBLIC LIBRARY2023 schedule, p. 58 · line 132

All amounts in Canadian dollars. A year with no line means the name wasn’t in that schedule, or the schedule isn’t held here — not that the body paid nothing.

A line here doesn’t match its source? Report a correction →

Notices for this name

Automated screens. Each is a question to investigate, not a finding.

Paid by several bodiesNot reviewed

$40,495,332 across the schedules that print this exact name

Question to ask: Do more than one public body disclose this same exact-name label, and is it one legal entity or two? (An exact-name overlap is not an entity resolution.)
What it does not prove: It does not establish that the label is one legal entity. This is an exact-name overlap only; entity resolution, ownership, competition, or legal conclusions require separate source-backed evidence.

Public-body recipientNot reviewed

A candidate public institution screen. It is left out of “top supplier” lists and the commercial concentration measure.

Question to ask: Is this large recipient a public body / remitter / utility / P3 entity / intergovernmental flow rather than a commercial supplier?
What it does not prove: A public-body / remitter / utility classification is a candidate screen, not a legal finding about a supplier or a competition outcome. It does not mean the flow was non-commercial or exempt from procurement rules.

Year-over-year jumpNot reviewed

Victoria: $5.23M → $6.56M (2024→25)

Question to ask: Does the year-over-year change reflect a new or terminating relationship, or a re-classification or one-off, and what (if any) project or contract evidence explains it?
What it does not prove: A year-over-year change in a disclosed aggregate amount is not evidence of a new contract, a non-competitive award, or wrongdoing. Timing and context require project, contract, or council-record evidence.