Supplier name · 4 yearly totals · 2023–2025

Insituform Technologies Ltd

Printed asInsituform Technologies LtdInsituform Technologies Ltd.

Two public bodies disclosed paying this name a combined $6,633,254.67 over three fiscal years.

$6.6M

from 2 public bodies over 3 fiscal years · #61 of 2,251 names by total disclosed

Who paid, and when

Each cell is one body’s yearly total for this name. Darker means more.

’232023’242024’252025

CRD$5.44Mas “…Limited” ↗$9.36Mas “…Limited” ↗$2.39Mdisclosed

Victoria$3.37Mdisclosed$830Kdisclosed$42Kdisclosed

Schedule held, name not in itNo schedule held — a coverage gap, not zeroSimilar name, printed differently — not added in

Disclosed to this name, by public body and fiscal year
Public body	2023	2024	2025
Capital Regional District	Printed differently as Insituform Technologies Limited, not added in	Printed differently as Insituform Technologies Limited, not added in	$2,390,965
City of Victoria	$3,370,351.47	$829,514	$42,424.20

By year, all bodies

Stacked by payer.

2023$3,370,351.47

2024$829,514

2025$2,433,389.20

CRDVictoria

Every disclosed amount

One line per body and year, exactly as published. Each source link opens the official document at the page.

Download these 4 rows (CSV)

Capital Regional District · 20252025$2,390,965Insituform Technologies Ltd.2025 schedule, p. 69 · line 302

City of Victoria · 20252025$42,424.20Insituform Technologies Ltd2025 schedule, row 211

City of Victoria · 20242024$829,514Insituform Technologies Ltd2024 schedule, row 214

City of Victoria · 20232023$3,370,351.47Insituform Technologies Ltd2023 schedule, row 198

All amounts in Canadian dollars. A year with no line means the name wasn’t in that schedule, or the schedule isn’t held here — not that the body paid nothing.

A line here doesn’t match its source? Report a correction →

Notices for this name

Automated screens. Each is a question to investigate, not a finding.

New nameNot reviewed

CRD: $2,390,965 in 2025, first year printed

Question to ask: Does the year-over-year change reflect a new or terminating relationship, or a re-classification or one-off, and what (if any) project or contract evidence explains it?
What it does not prove: A year-over-year change in a disclosed aggregate amount is not evidence of a new contract, a non-competitive award, or wrongdoing. Timing and context require project, contract, or council-record evidence.

Year-over-year jumpNot reviewed

Victoria: $3.37M → $830K (2023→24)

Question to ask: Does the year-over-year change reflect a new or terminating relationship, or a re-classification or one-off, and what (if any) project or contract evidence explains it?
What it does not prove: A year-over-year change in a disclosed aggregate amount is not evidence of a new contract, a non-competitive award, or wrongdoing. Timing and context require project, contract, or council-record evidence.