Supplier name · 4 yearly totals · 2023–2025

Jacob Bros. Construction Inc

Printed asJacob Bros. Construction IncJacob Bros. Construction Inc.

Two public bodies disclosed paying this name a combined $19,157,650.67 over three fiscal years.

$19.2M

from 2 public bodies over 3 fiscal years · #18 of 2,251 names by total disclosed

Who paid, and when

Each cell is one body’s yearly total for this name. Darker means more.

’232023’242024’252025

CRD$7.75Mlarge share—not in schedule$71Kdisclosed

Victoria—not in schedule$4.22Mlarge share$7.11Mlarge share

Schedule held, name not in itNo schedule held — a coverage gap, not zero

Disclosed to this name, by public body and fiscal year
Public body	2023	2024	2025
Capital Regional District	$7,754,271	Not in the schedule	$70,806
City of Victoria	Not in the schedule	$4,219,860	$7,112,713.67

By year, all bodies

Stacked by payer.

2023$7,754,271

2024$4,219,860

2025$7,183,519.67

CRDVictoria

Every disclosed amount

One line per body and year, exactly as published. Each source link opens the official document at the page.

Download these 4 rows (CSV)

Capital Regional District · 20252025$70,806Jacob Bros. Construction Inc.2025 schedule, p. 70 · line 322

Capital Regional District · 20232023$7,754,271Jacob Bros. Construction Inc.2023 schedule, p. 72 · line 279

City of Victoria · 20252025$7,112,713.67Jacob Bros. Construction Inc2025 schedule, row 225

City of Victoria · 20242024$4,219,860Jacob Bros. Construction Inc2024 schedule, row 228

All amounts in Canadian dollars. A year with no line means the name wasn’t in that schedule, or the schedule isn’t held here — not that the body paid nothing.

A line here doesn’t match its source? Report a correction →

Notices for this name

Automated screens. Each is a question to investigate, not a finding.

New nameNot reviewed

Victoria: $4,219,860 in 2024, first year printed

Question to ask: Does the year-over-year change reflect a new or terminating relationship, or a re-classification or one-off, and what (if any) project or contract evidence explains it?
What it does not prove: A year-over-year change in a disclosed aggregate amount is not evidence of a new contract, a non-competitive award, or wrongdoing. Timing and context require project, contract, or council-record evidence.

Year-over-year jumpNot reviewed

Victoria: $4.22M → $7.11M (2024→25)

Question to ask: Does the year-over-year change reflect a new or terminating relationship, or a re-classification or one-off, and what (if any) project or contract evidence explains it?
What it does not prove: A year-over-year change in a disclosed aggregate amount is not evidence of a new contract, a non-competitive award, or wrongdoing. Timing and context require project, contract, or council-record evidence.