Supplier name · 3 yearly totals · Saanich only

KNAPPETT PROJECTS INC

The District of Saanich disclosed paying this name $17,999,878 over three fiscal years.

$18M

from 1 public body over 3 fiscal years · #20 of 2,251 names by total disclosed

Who paid, and when

Each cell is one body’s yearly total for this name. Darker means more.

’232023’242024’252025

Saanich$338Kdisclosed$4.96Mdisclosed$12.70Mlarge share

Schedule held, name not in itNo schedule held — a coverage gap, not zero

Disclosed to this name, by public body and fiscal year
Public body	2023	2024	2025
District of Saanich	$337,629	$4,962,309	$12,699,940

By year, all bodies

Stacked by payer.

2023$337,629

2024$4,962,309

2025$12,699,940

Saanich

Every disclosed amount

One line per body and year, exactly as published. Each source link opens the official document at the page.

Download these 3 rows (CSV)

District of Saanich · 20252025$12,699,940KNAPPETT PROJECTS INC2025 schedule, p. 60 · line 210

District of Saanich · 20242024$4,962,309KNAPPETT PROJECTS INC2024 schedule, p. 60 · line 185

District of Saanich · 20232023$337,629KNAPPETT PROJECTS INC2023 schedule, p. 58 · line 171

All amounts in Canadian dollars. A year with no line means the name wasn’t in that schedule, or the schedule isn’t held here — not that the body paid nothing.

A line here doesn’t match its source? Report a correction →

Notices for this name

Automated screens. Each is a question to investigate, not a finding.

Large yearly totalNot reviewed

Saanich 2025: $12,699,940

Question to ask: For a large disclosed aggregate, is the label one supplier or several, and for an 'In Trust' payee who is the actual client or beneficial recipient?
What it does not prove: This is an annual aggregate disclosed amount, not an invoice, contract, transaction count, beneficial-owner attribution, or procurement finding. For an 'In Trust' / intermediary payee it does not show the client or beneficial recipient.

Year-over-year jumpNot reviewed

Saanich: $4.96M → $12.70M (2024→25)Saanich: $338K → $4.96M (2023→24)

Question to ask: Does the year-over-year change reflect a new or terminating relationship, or a re-classification or one-off, and what (if any) project or contract evidence explains it?
What it does not prove: A year-over-year change in a disclosed aggregate amount is not evidence of a new contract, a non-competitive award, or wrongdoing. Timing and context require project, contract, or council-record evidence.