Screened as a public body · 3 yearly totals · Victoria only

Municipal Pension Plan

The City of Victoria disclosed paying this name $43,500,208.43 over three fiscal years.

$43.5M

from 1 public body over 3 fiscal years · #4 of 2,251 names by total disclosed

Who paid, and when

Each cell is one body’s yearly total for this name. Darker means more.

’232023’242024’252025

Victoria$13.29Mlarge share$15.04Mlarge share$15.17Mlarge share

Schedule held, name not in itNo schedule held — a coverage gap, not zero

Disclosed to this name, by public body and fiscal year
Public body	2023	2024	2025
City of Victoria	$13,289,873.12	$15,042,408	$15,167,927.31

By year, all bodies

Stacked by payer.

2023$13,289,873.12

2024$15,042,408

2025$15,167,927.31

Victoria

Every disclosed amount

One line per body and year, exactly as published. Each source link opens the official document at the page.

Download these 3 rows (CSV)

City of Victoria · 20252025$15,167,927.31Municipal Pension Plan2025 schedule, row 284

City of Victoria · 20242024$15,042,408Municipal Pension Plan2024 schedule, row 289

City of Victoria · 20232023$13,289,873.12Municipal Pension Plan2023 schedule, row 271

All amounts in Canadian dollars. A year with no line means the name wasn’t in that schedule, or the schedule isn’t held here — not that the body paid nothing.

A line here doesn’t match its source? Report a correction →

Notices for this name

Automated screens. Each is a question to investigate, not a finding.

Public-body recipientIn review · no human sign-off

A candidate statutory remitter screen. It is left out of “top supplier” lists and the commercial concentration measure.

Question to ask: Is this large recipient a public body / remitter / utility / P3 entity / intergovernmental flow rather than a commercial supplier?
What it does not prove: A public-body / remitter / utility classification is a candidate screen, not a legal finding about a supplier or a competition outcome. It does not mean the flow was non-commercial or exempt from procurement rules.

Large yearly totalNot reviewed

Victoria 2025: $15,167,927.31 Victoria 2024: $15,042,408 Victoria 2023: $13,289,873.12

Question to ask: For a large disclosed aggregate, is the label one supplier or several, and for an 'In Trust' payee who is the actual client or beneficial recipient?
What it does not prove: This is an annual aggregate disclosed amount, not an invoice, contract, transaction count, beneficial-owner attribution, or procurement finding. For an 'In Trust' / intermediary payee it does not show the client or beneficial recipient.

Year-over-year jumpNot reviewed

Victoria: $13.29M → $15.04M (2023→24)

Question to ask: Does the year-over-year change reflect a new or terminating relationship, or a re-classification or one-off, and what (if any) project or contract evidence explains it?
What it does not prove: A year-over-year change in a disclosed aggregate amount is not evidence of a new contract, a non-competitive award, or wrongdoing. Timing and context require project, contract, or council-record evidence.