Skip to content
Public SpendPublic SpendCapital Region

Supplier name · 3 yearly totals · Victoria only

Island Asphalt Ltd

The City of Victoria disclosed paying this name $14,728,772.84 over three fiscal years.

$14.7M

from 1 public body over 3 fiscal years · #27 of 2,251 names by total disclosed

Who paid, and when

Each cell is one body’s yearly total for this name. Darker means more.

232023242024252025
CRDnot in schedule$201Kas “…Company” ↗not in schedule
Victoria$5.43Mlarge share$4.01Mlarge share$5.29Mlarge share
Schedule held, name not in itNo schedule held — a coverage gap, not zeroSimilar name, printed differently — not added in
Disclosed to this name, by public body and fiscal year
Public body202320242025
Capital Regional DistrictNot in the schedulePrinted differently as Island Asphalt Company, not added inNot in the schedule
City of Victoria$5,430,747.69$4,008,485$5,289,540.15
District of Oak BayPrinted differently as Island Asphalt Company, not added inNo schedule heldPrinted differently as Island Asphalt Company, not added in
District of SaanichPrinted differently as Island Asphalt Company, not added inPrinted differently as Island Asphalt Company, not added inPrinted differently as Island Asphalt Company, not added in

By year, all bodies

Stacked by payer.

2023$5,430,747.69
2024$4,008,485
2025$5,289,540.15
Victoria

Every disclosed amount

One line per body and year, exactly as published. Each source link opens the official document at the page.

Download these 3 rows (CSV)
City of Victoria · 20252025$5,289,540.15Island Asphalt Ltd2025 schedule, row 218
City of Victoria · 20242024$4,008,485Island Asphalt Ltd2024 schedule, row 222
City of Victoria · 20232023$5,430,747.69Island Asphalt Ltd2023 schedule, row 204

All amounts in Canadian dollars. A year with no line means the name wasn’t in that schedule, or the schedule isn’t held here — not that the body paid nothing.

A line here doesn’t match its source? Report a correction →

Notices for this name

Automated screens. Each is a question to investigate, not a finding.

Year-over-year jumpNot reviewed
Year-over-year jumpNot reviewed
Question to ask
Does the year-over-year change reflect a new or terminating relationship, or a re-classification or one-off, and what (if any) project or contract evidence explains it?
What it does not prove
A year-over-year change in a disclosed aggregate amount is not evidence of a new contract, a non-competitive award, or wrongdoing. Timing and context require project, contract, or council-record evidence.